Evan Bynoe vs Charlelie Cosnet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Aug at 09:34 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Bynoe vs C. Cosnet

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bynoe 1 - 0 Cosnet
They have played 2 sets in total, with Evan Bynoe winning 2 and Charlelie Cosnet winning 0. The last match between Evan Bynoe and Charlelie Cosnet was at the M15 Huntsville, 13-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Evan Bynoe getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bynoe | 1 |
| Cosnet | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Huntsville(08-13-25)
E. Bynoe vs C. Cosnet H2H Profile
E. Bynoe vs C. Cosnet Match Preview:
- How do both players fare on their second serve? Recently, Bynoe has been more efficient, securing 47.06% of points compared to Cosnet's 37.37%.
- In returning second serves, Cosnet edges out slightly with a 51.53% win rate against Bynoe's 48.14%.
- Both players show similar performances when returning first serves, with Bynoe at 30.09% and Cosnet at 30.9%.
- When under pressure, especially in break point situations, Bynoe excels, having saved 51.26% of breakpoints, while Cosnet has a lower rate of 39.73%.
- Over the last year, Bynoe has a stronger winning rate at 56.92% compared to Cosnet's 46.67%.
- On clay, both players show equal strength, winning 61% of matches. However, Bynoe is slightly better on indoor hard courts with a 43% win rate, compared to Cosnet’s 33%.
- Considering the level of opponents faced, Cosnet has encountered tougher competitors with an average rank of 184.67, whereas Bynoe’s opponents were ranked 272.69 on average.
- In deciding sets over the past year, Bynoe has been successful 57% of the time, while Cosnet has yet to win in such scenarios.
- Regarding breakpoint conversion, Cosnet is marginally ahead, converting 38.3% of opportunities against Bynoe's 36.76%.
Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):
Bynoe's superior second serve performance suggests a consistent edge over Cosnet, who struggles more in this area. This could translate to effective service games, minimizing opportunities for Cosnet to break and gain momentum.
Cosnet has shown slight prowess in returning second serves but might find challenges in capitalizing on these returns given Bynoe's ability to save crucial breakpoints.
Both players favor clay, making the surface a neutral factor in this matchup. However, Bynoe's experience and success in tight, deciding set situations could prove pivotal, especially if the match goes the distance.
While Cosnet faces tougher opponents, the lack of converting those challenges into deciding set wins and overall match victories suggests they might struggle against Bynoe's resilience and recent form.
Based on these insights, Bynoe is the likely favorite to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis clash, leveraging their strengths under pressure and consistent play across various scenarios.
Evan Bynoe vs Charlelie Cosnet Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Bynoe vs C. Cosnet H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:29:1 | Average Match Time | 2:29:1 |
| 74% (53/72) | 1st Serve % | 68% (58/85) |
| 70% (37/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (33/58) |
| 37% (7/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
| 48% (41/85) | Return Points Win % | 39% (28/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Bynoe Recent Matches Played
C. Cosnet Recent Matches Played

E. Bynoe vs C. Cosnet Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.83% (92/89) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.33% (32/28) |
| 50.49% (205/201) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.14% (72/61) |
| 50.45% (1906/1872) | Games Win/Loss | 51.24% (661/629) |
| 46.24% (43/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (16/16) |
| 60.00% (39/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.33% (14/10) |
| 43.48% (10/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 234 | Aces Total | 59 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 383 | Total Double Faults | 136 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 292.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 219.28 |
| 62% (4140/6647) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1245/2073) |
| 63% (2594/4140) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (786/1245) |
| 45% (1123/2507) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (394/828) |
| 44% (269/618) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (97/203) |
| 39% (2518/6378) | Return Points Win % | 42% (848/2040) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.85% (90/87) | Futures W/L | 53.33% (32/28) |
| 50% (89/177) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (32/59) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (21/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (6/10) |
| 50% (21/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 88% (93/82) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (31/28) |
| 11% (93/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (31/3) |
| 11% (88/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (29/4) |